<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines</link>
	<description>Explore Experience Expand Consciousness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in Realizing</title>
		<link>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/skips-guidelines-prep-sessions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/skips-guidelines-prep-sessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 17:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Skip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Focus Archive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The theme of the six-day Guidelines program, which I have attended several times, is to assist the individual in learning methods through which conscious contact (a unity experience in the form of communication) can be established with one's Total Self – or Inner Self Helper (ISH), or Guidance, or Non-Physical Friends, or Universal Consciousness. Remembering [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-child "><font size="+1">The theme of the six-day Guidelines program, which I have attended several times, is to assist the individual in learning methods through which conscious contact (a unity experience in the form of communication) can be established with one's Total Self – or Inner Self Helper (ISH), or Guidance, or Non-Physical Friends, or Universal Consciousness.</p>
<p>Remembering the elation of my Gateway Voyage experiences, I came to Guidelines filled with expectations. But this is an entirely different program with a consciousness horizon far beyond those of the Gateway Voyage. Once I realized this, I opened to what the program had to offer.</p>
<p>Working primarily in Focus 21, the program encourages the practical application of communications with one's true nature. With practice, I learned to quickly and directly access whatever information I needed. The goal is to make such lines of communication as direct and natural as possible. During a business meeting, for example, one can calmly and serenely access the communication skills learned and apply them within the context of the situation.</p>
<p>Also included is direct training relating to the out-of-body state and to the use of healing energy for oneself and others. I had my own personalized session during the program in a specially designed isolation chamber in the lab, which is where my travels continued. These are called Personal Resource Exploration Program (PREP) sessions . After completing the Guidelines I was able to do more PREP sessions.</p>
<p>In preparation for one of these sessions, I talked about the fact that for some time I had been having mental visions, dreams, or experiences that I recognized as recurring mental visions, or trips, from my childhood. I was wondering why these episodes were once again drifting into my consciousness. I had also been having stomach problems ever since I retired from the army, and I was seeking some insight into possible metaphysical causes of these symptoms. I set learning about these topics as my goal for a PREP session.</p>
<p>My questions about recurring visions from my youth seemed to be answered with an explanation of a "calendar of time" and the fact that these events aren't always coexistent from a temporal perspective. Apparently, events of our perceived past are not fixed and can be altered by present activities and the future present as well. My awareness of this happening was experienced as recurring visions of what I perceive as the temporal past but in reality are as yet uncompleted events. All that exists is the present. What we call the past is information (as in, in-formation, not solid). What we call the future forms by the laws of probability, intent-consciousness, and present activities (which, of course, becomes part of the past in-formation a moment from now).</p>
<p>During the session, I was reminded (put into my right-mind) that the question of purpose doesn't make sense. I also realized that, rather than using "who, what, why, when, or how," I should simply say in my mind "explain," to solicit the answers to questions I (or an aspect of myself) may have. Apparently, the use of the interrogatives limits the response by confining the answer provided to the boundaries of a belief that we are somehow separate from this knowledge. "Explain," on the other hand, simply means to make obvious what is already known and imposes none of these belief limitations.</p>
<p>When I sought answers concerning my colitis, I uncovered an aspective expression of myself that appeared to me as a black bird. Guidance offered this black bird and its nest-tending concerns as a metaphor. The black bird was concerned about losing its identity as a nest tender and principal family caregiver when its offspring outgrew the confines of the nest and their dependency. The nest-tender personality or aspect was, in a sense, facing death – and wasn't facing this transition comfortably.</p>
<p>I was unable to resolve the issues surrounding Nest Tender during this session because my bladder filled up to the point of physical discomfort and I couldn't continue with the session. This theme, however, continued for several years in many sessions.</p>
<p>Just two weeks later, I had the opportunity to do another PREP session. Before the session, I thought about the nest-tender aspect from my previous session. During the session, something wonderful happened. I discovered another aspect of myself that I have come to know as "the Flower." An unusual energy pattern also made itself known. It flooded my consciousness and spoke with a voice of its own while I remained in the background, mindful of all that was happening.</p>
<p>The nest-tender metaphor appeared as a mouse this time, and the suggestion was that Nest Tender was sleeping. I was told that offspring activity (children) and spousal influences contribute to upsetting Nest Tender. But my attention was quickly drawn away from this line of inquiry.</p>
<p>I began to focus on realizing (making real) an alternate aspect or personality within me, the Flower. In the days previous to this session, I had been discussing the idea of totem symbolism as a viable expression of life's patterns. During the session, this notion emerged and I began my search for an alternate aspective expression or animal totem that was appropriate.</p>
<p>My analytical approach was abruptly set aside and I found myself releasing the issue to Guidance, a la Florence Scovel Shinn. It was then that I discovered the Flower. Part of this wonderful discovery included experiencing a new form of communication. My thoughts and words separated, and I began to hear myself speaking in a rather unusual voice. I was fully aware of what was happening and the experience did not frighten me.</p>
<p>During prior sessions, I had been noticing various kinesthetic sensations, tickling, and pressure in various places, especially in my nose. The rhetoric that I heard during programs at the Institute involved the concept of controlling these kinds of vibrations or feelings. Before this booth session, I had decided that control could be identified with ego and that perhaps expressing willingness to experience these sensations might be more appropriate.</p>
<p>I had thought about ego being afraid of the unknown – of whatever it could not control. So, when I began to have these kinesthetic sensations during the session, I silently welcomed the feelings and the experience. I invited the tickling and the vibrations and expressed my genuine gratitude for the event. In retrospect, I think these expressions of acceptance are what led to the experience of the unusual energy voice from within.</p>
<p>The essence of being a flower appealed to me. This aspective expression was not based on relationships with others either by judgment or expectation. The flower reaches for the light and in so doing demonstrates to all the elegance of its beauty. The flower centers its consciousness not on its stem and roots but on the blossom, on the radiation of its beauty and in sharing that beauty with all that come to it. So, in effect, even when the plant dies, its beauty, its consciousness, lives on in the joy that it has shared.</p>
<p>I was reminded too that, beyond expressing the flower essence within me, I could seek out the flowerness in all around me. The session ended with a bit of knowing beyond all of this, which may have been a hint of things to come. Guidance seemed to be affirming the appropriateness of me focusing on becoming the Flower while at the same time reminding me that there is a greater expression that one might call the garden. This hint came at the end of the session and at the time I didn't fully appreciate its value.</p>
<p>I now think Guidance was reminding me that to perceive one's self as a sole flower reinforces the illusion of separateness. Awareness of one's identity as the whole garden realizes (makes real) our true nature. Does that make God the gardener? Or is there no separateness there either?</p>
<p>This whole session was capped by a very interesting experience. Without disclosing the contents of my session, I had made an audio-cassette copy of the narrative and sent the tape to Fay, my fiancee at the time, in North Carolina. Unknown to me, this beautiful woman had sent the following little story to me on the same day. Our correspondence crossed in the mail. Here's the story she sent:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Suppose you'd known for a long time that you were a weed. When you were just a little sprout, before anyone had told you that you were a weed, you'd known something of what flowers feel like. And as you grew, you felt you'd like it better if you were a flower. But you learned to be satisfied living as a weed nonetheless – most of the time. You learned to bend a little so as not to take up too much sun, and to eat and drink and breathe not quite so much so as not to take too much nourishment from the flowers around you. It's only in spring, when the flowers start to bloom, that it's hard to be weed-like. Then, when the warm breeze comes, you feel a stirring, a hope, a wish for just a taste of blooming, but you can't of course because you're just a weed.</p>
<p>Now suppose that one day a lovely creature walks into your field looking for flowers. And suppose she walks straight up to you and says, 'What a strange and lovely flower is this hidden from the light!' For a moment you would not believe her. But oh, you would want to. So you might begin softly to look and feel around yourself. And what if you discovered that this had all been a silly mistake – that you were not a weed, but a flower after all.</p>
<p>Well, that's what it feels like. A little sad that I spent so much time as a weed when I didn't have to. A little in shock. A little exposed. Excited, in a quiet way, to discover what I'm all about. I don't know much about being a flower, yet. But it's me, and I love it, and I'm giving it all I've got.”</p>
<p>Author Unknown
</p></blockquote>
<p>The story was accompanied by a drawing of a flower looking at a reflection of itself as a weed, not realizing its true nature because of the image of itself that it saw. It reminded me of an anorexic looking into a mirror and not seeing a thin person.</p>
<p>After we received our respective mailings, Fay and I were astonished by the serendipity. It brought us closer together (as if we were ever really separate in the first place). I thought long and hard about this session and the circumstances surrounding it. Even today, Fay and I speak fondly of the memories it has left with us. </p>
<p>A month later, I did another PREP session that turned out to be a major breakthrough. I discussed my intent for this next session, as I had done for the previous work. I wanted to ask Guidance about Fay, to explain this new and wondrous relationship with me.</p>
<p>I had met Fay when she came to the Institute on a Saturday morning for a prearranged tour of the facilities. The minute I saw her, I thought I recognized her. As the tour progressed, we wound up in the lab. Fay and I were standing in the doorway of the isolation booth while I explained the soundproofing, the floatation bed, and the physiological monitoring. I gradually became aware of the rest of the world fading away. Within just a few seconds, Fay and I were seemingly alone.</p>
<p>Although my mouth kept spewing out the construction details and technical attributes of the booth, I was alert to the fact that things were not at all as they seemed. As Dorothy said in The Wizard of Oz, "I have a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." This strange place we fell into seemed to extend beyond all space and time. It was truly the proverbial forever. Just as gently as it had come over us, it was gone. We looked at each other and, without speaking, joined the others on the Institute tour.</p>
<p>The next significant activity that day was lunch. We ordered takeout and got some croissant sandwiches with dill-flavored potato salad from the Blue Ridge Pig, a local rustic cafe in Nellysford. Several Institute staff members and those taking the tour sat around the lunch table, socializing and getting to know one another. Fay started talking about moving out to Seattle to work for Lou Tice and his Investment in Excellence program. It seemed to me from her enthusiasm that this move was inevitable.</p>
<p>I couldn't take my eyes off her. She was so beautiful. I longed for the taste of her lips on mine. Unexpectedly, I heard myself thinking, "Why are you leaving me now that I have found you, after so long?" Fay looked at me and blushed with embarrassment, then looked away. She must have heard my thoughts.</p>
<p>After lunch, I asked my fellow staff members at the Institute if I had said anything unusual at lunch. They reported that I had not. Fortunately, Fay canceled her plans to move to Seattle, and our relationship quickly blossomed. But I still wanted to ask Guidance about Fay. Who was she? What was the overpowering attraction? It was something greater, deeper, and more profound than sex. What could it be?</p>
<p>I also wanted to understand more about this unusual energy voice that spoke the truth from somewhere inside my heart. The energy-voice experience had touched me deeply. It was intensely personal. I felt as though I was exposing myself, the true me without any social masks behind which I could safely hide. I thought about using affirmations of willingness to encourage more contact with the energy voice and my bride-to-be, Fay, with whom I shared these adventures, was perhaps finding out more about me than she had imagined.</p>
<p>In answer to my questions about Fay, I found myself in what appeared to be a bedroom scene. At the time, I thought this was too silly and too filled with sexual innuendo to be real. But then I was shown a heart-shaped pillow and told that this symbolized Fay as the epitome of the expression "a heart of gold." (Later, during a visit to Fay's house in North Carolina, I was intrigued to find out that she indeed had a heart-shaped pillow with white lace on her bed.)</p>
<p>I consider this session a breakthrough because of the intensity of the experience with the energy voice. The experience was very physical. I experienced the unconditional love of my total self. I found out more about the flower aspect, the garden, and tending the garden. And I discovered that asking to understand is a rather narrow concept.</p>
<p>Guidance told me not to limit myself (by asking to understand) but to express my willingness to experience love – in so doing I will come to know <em>All That Is</em>. What is valuable is experience, and Fay with her heart of gold was to be just such an experience.</p>
<p>My exploration of reality through personal experience continues today. I enjoy attending the Institute programs and occasionally doing a PREP session in the booth in the lab.</p>
<p>Through life's process, I have realized the rhetoric of my childhood. We are never separate from spirit. Things are not physical or spiritual. We are, always. We sometimes have physical experiences. I realize, therefore, it is not especially necessary to enter a focus-level state to commune with my spiritual self. I am that being and all it takes is a simple shift in perspective to access all that I AM.</p>
<p>My ventures have helped answer some of those persistent questions that were originally presented in the Gateway Voyage program. Who am I? Where and who was I before I entered this physical being? What is my purpose for this existence in physical-matter reality? What action can I now take to best serve this purpose? What is the content of the most important message that I can receive and understand at this point in my existence?</p>
<p>Right now the answers seem to be:</p>
<p>1. I am a spiritual being.<br />
2. I am and always will be more than this physical body – I am a spiritual being.<br />
3. My purpose here is to experience the awareness of <em>All That Is</em>.<br />
4. There is nothing I can do that does not best serve this purpose.<br />
5. The most important message for me (seemingly) changes from day to day. If I had to come up with the message for today, as I'm sitting here at my keyboard, it would be, "All is love." Coupled with previous insight, this yields "I AM = Love," or simply, "I am love." . . . Cool.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/skips-guidelines-prep-sessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Travels With ISH</title>
		<link>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/travels-with-ish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/travels-with-ish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Monroe Institute</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Focus Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voyages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dimensional model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intuition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe mcmoneagle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map coordinates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematical formula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing waves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Winter 1992 by Raymond Haimila First, I would like to thank my tour guide for introducing me to ISH (Inner Self Helper); thank you, Robert Monroe. ISH has always been there for me to access and many times in the past I had, but then I would call it my intuition. Now I understand the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-child "><strong>Winter 1992<br />
by Raymond Haimila</strong></p>
<p>First, I would like to thank my tour guide for introducing me to ISH (Inner Self Helper); thank you, Robert Monroe. ISH has always been there for me to access and many times in the past I had, but then I would call it my intuition. Now I understand the duality of it all. In the beginning (how many lifetimes ago I do not know), I was the access for ISH into this universe called time space; a vehicle more or less, used to experience a set of parameters that appear to be quite unique. . . . The experience is manyfold (i.e., physical, mental, and emotional, or psychological just to name a few).</p>
<p>The second part of this duality is that I have access to the ISH--a two-way street that so few of us realize is available. According to ISH, it is an access to EVERYTHING. I have been shown a picture that is very similar to Bob's description of a transducer. Energy (electrical) is at one end and energy (mechanical) is at the other, the mechanical being the physical system and the electrical more like the energy matrix (hologram) described by Joe McMoneagle in FOCUS Vol. XII, No. 4.</p>
<p>Access to the hologram seems to be by a system of standing waves, like map coordinates. I seem to be stymied by one doorway I have been shown. It does not appear as what I know on my visual screen as a standing wave, although I am told it is another doorway. I think I have been given part of the coordinates to access it. I always thought my ISH was named George, as these were the letters that always appear on my mind's visual screen. Now, though, they appear as significant . . . Ge Or Ge.</p>
<p>Ge, I think represents gamma frequencies; Or, I am not sure, possibly origin, maybe a radius? ? ?</p>
<p>The door is more like a three-dimensional model of a mathematical formula, blazing gold, rotating slowly, and filled with voids colored a royal blue; the same as the background color of this whole quadrant in the hologram.</p>
<p>[Learning about ISH is part of the <a href="/guidelines/">Guidelines Program.</a>]</p>
<hr />
<p>Hemi-Sync® is a registered trademark of Interstate Industries, Inc.</p>
<p>© 1992 by The Monroe Institute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/travels-with-ish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidelines for Understanding Dimensionality</title>
		<link>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/guidelines-for-understanding-dimensionality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/guidelines-for-understanding-dimensionality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Monroe Institute</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Focus Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voyages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conceptual questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dimensional reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gateway voyage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levels of consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics and physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical constraint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three dimensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summer 1999 by Todd Phillips Systems engineer Todd Phillips attended the Gateway Voyage in June 1997. Little did he imagine that the levels of consciousness he would encounter upon returning for Guidelines in April 1999 would illuminate a problem he had been wrestling with for years. As an analytical person by nature and an engineer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-child "><strong>Summer 1999<br />
by Todd Phillips</strong><br />
<em><br />
Systems engineer Todd Phillips attended the <a href="/gateway_voyage/">Gateway Voyage</a> in June 1997. Little did he imagine that the levels of consciousness he would encounter upon returning for <a href="/guidelines/">Guidelines</a> in April 1999 would illuminate a problem he had been wrestling with for years.</em></p>
<p>As an analytical person by nature and an engineer by trade, I tend to be intrigued by conceptual questions involving mathematics and physics. One topic that I have considered at length is dimensionality--specifically the nature of higher dimensions. For the most part, my efforts at solutions have produced little more than a spatial headache. However, while attending the <a href="/guidelines/">Guidelines</a> program in April some very surprising insights concerning this issue were revealed. In order to present a meaningful account of those insights I must, like any well-trained engineer, give some attention to setting up the problem.</p>
<p>Part I - Spaceland: The Place of Physical Constraint</p>
<p>The following explanation of dimensionality is abstracted from the second edition of the book Flatland, written by Edwin Abbot in 1884. Abbot’s construct is as follows:</p>
<p>* Pointland: a point has no or zero dimensions. It has no measurable features of length, width, or height.<br />
* Lineland: if a point is moved along a straight path, then a line is formed. The line has one dimension. It has length.<br />
* Flatland: if a line is moved horizontally along a straight path such that no point in the line passes through a point previously occupied by any point in the line, then a rectangle or square is formed. The square has two dimensions. It has length and width.<br />
* Spaceland: if a square is then moved vertically along a straight path such that no point in the square passes through a point previously occupied by any point in the square, then a cube is formed. The cube has three dimensions. It has length, width, and height.</p>
<p>We exist physically in three-dimensional reality, which results in a dilemma. If a cube is moved directionally along a straight path, such that no point in the cube passes through a point previously occupied by any point in the cube, then . . . what? The resulting object would most surely be four-dimensional. But what is this dimension? What is the resulting object? In what direction must the cube be moved in order to realize this object? Once these questions have been resolved, the process can be reiterated to obtain a resulting object of five dimensions, and so on. So what is a linear, serial-processing mind to conclude? Prior to attending <a href="/guidelines/">Guidelines</a>, I had begun to suspect that actually determining the mathematical, geometric solution might not be the most significant function being tested by this problem.</p>
<p>Part II - Lightland: The Space of Limitless Love</p>
<p>The following experience occurred during a <a href="/guidelines/">Guidelines</a> tape exercise which instructs the listener to meet with an Inner Self Helper at Focus 21 and sequentially explore his/her physical, emotional, and energy selves. My sole intent during this exercise was to take the knowledge offered about each aspect of myself and to be open to receiving and considering it as the most productive information for me to have at that time.</p>
<p>My Guide met me at Focus 21, and we proceeded through the exercise according to the instructions. During the portion of the tape for exploring the energy self, I became aware of a cube nestled in the three standard spatial axes. <em>What’s going on?</em> I asked. <em>Go ahead, move it</em>, she replied. <em>I’ve tried and I can’t; I need another axis</em>, I hinted. There was no response. So, once again I tried to move the cube without passing it through any previously occupied points. Once again, I was unsuccessful.<br />
<em><br />
Don’t worry. . . . You can’t fully understand or comprehend this in your current form</em> [while you are bound to being human], she explained. <em>Keep looking at it</em>. As I examined the cube further it appeared to expand. This expansion rushed through and around me in a rapid burst of light and energy that seemed to go everywhere instantaneously. I looked out, across the surrounding expanse, and could discern no edges. I looked in, to where the cube had been, and could see nothing but a brightly radiating point. The cube was everywhere yet nowhere.</p>
<p><em>It is love,</em> she explained.<em> It will be easier for you to think of this as limitless, unbounded, and unconstrained, but not as infinite. Why not infinite?</em> I asked. <em>Because infinity is too hard for you [humans]. . . . Try to think of it as NOT infinite, yet as still continuous</em>. I took a moment to absorb this information. I took a longer moment to absorb the feelings of peace and vibrancy that were saturating me, almost overwhelming me. I wanted to remember it all.</p>
<p>It seems that the most revealing events are often the least expected. I am still not exactly sure what to make of this one. I realize that my Guide’s last statement is a mathematical paradox. Her advice on perspective seems to be related to the fact that continuous is a less intimidating word than infinite and that continuous in this context refers more to a homogeneous totality than to mathematics.</p>
<p>One of the messages here concerns not beating myself up over “solving” the problem-- it is simply beyond my current level of reasoning ability. Another message is that understanding dimensionality is primarily an energy problem rather than a physical problem and must be approached accordingly. Perhaps the most important message is that love (or love energy) is essential to the construct of any higher dimension--just as length, width, and height are fundamentals of the three dimensions in which we live. Thus, visualizing and comprehending the fourth dimension, as well as any beyond it, requires a full understanding of the expansive and unconditional nature of love.</p>
<p>In any case, I now realize where my attention should be focused.</p>
<hr />
<p>Hemi-Sync® is a registered trademark of Interstate Industries, Inc.</p>
<p>© 1999 by The Monroe Institute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.monroeinstitute.org/guidelines/guidelines-for-understanding-dimensionality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

